CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12] — Page 460

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

DOWNING STREET, LONDON.
17th April 1903.

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 8th instant in which you make an observation with regard to the communication to Mr Southey of the decision of the Government of Hong Kong with regard to his application for employment as Executive Engineer in that Colony.

In reply I have to inform you that we do not understand why we were under an obligation to conceal the decision of the Colonial Government from Mr Southey. It seemed to us that it was our duty to inform Mr Southey of the decision in question as he might otherwise have remained under a misapprehension in the matter, especially as it was with his concurrence that the telegram of the 16th ultimo was sent to the Government of Hong Kong and it was no doubt perfectly clear to him that his birth might conceivably constitute an objection to his being selected for the position which he was seeking.

We should be glad to receive fuller directions as to the cases in which it is desired that we should not communicate the decisions of Colonial Governments to applicants.

I have the honour to be, Sir,
Your Obedient Servant,

Secretary of State,
&c. &c. &c.
Colonial Office.

C.O. 14140/154
Hong Kong. 12202

Page 1

extent committed to selecting him
Tombly the Cornelling bageris had said that they would
the Yee of the recommend him for that must first get the concurrence of the Colonial you; and when that refused, they had to tell him
ferhaps
Was
an
it wast
an
ssolt shin, know that he had
well
no
technical fost in
a second
chance of a high present diment
the
The foregoing would. I
In the C.A. case. On
miegui, the general
be that when it in Hathe be should I question, the anniver to consult acobuial
Got the condillal should not
ay
candidate
know that the Got Carmelted at all you is being
A. F.
Mr Mercer & I have talked
this are. Put B,
Pat By
Cid
21 atonce
20/
}
TONG ON THIS SUBJECT
PRESSED TO THE
TE FOR THE COLONIES,
WE REFERENCE AND
LETTER BEING QUOTED
Sir,

Page ...

The original text appears to be a jumbled mix of unrelated sentences and words, likely due to OCR errors. The coherent text is a letter from the Colonial Office, dated 17th April 1903, discussing the communication of decisions to applicants. I have reformatted the coherent text into proper paragraphs and preserved the original page numbering information. The unrelated sentences and words are left as is, with minimal correction, to reflect the original OCR output.

Edit History

2026-06-01 11:52:35 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
DOWNING STREET, LONDON. 17th April 1903. I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 8th instant in which you make an observation with regard to the communication to Mr Southey of the decision of the Government of Hong Kong with regard to his application for employment as Executive Engineer in that Colony. In reply I have to inform you that we do not understand why we were under an obligation to conceal the decision of the Colonial Government from Mr Southey. It seemed to us that it was our duty to inform Mr Southey of the decision in question as he might otherwise have remained under a misapprehension in the matter, especially as it was with his concurrence that the telegram of the 16th ultimo was sent to the Government of Hong Kong and it was no doubt perfectly clear to him that his birth might conceivably constitute an objection to his being selected for the position which he was seeking. We should be glad to receive fuller directions as to the cases in which it is desired that we should not communicate the decisions of Colonial Governments to applicants. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your Obedient Servant, Secretary of State, &c. &c. &c. Colonial Office. C.O. 14140/154 Hong Kong. 12202 Page 1 extent committed to selecting him Tombly the Cornelling bageris had said that they would the Yee of the recommend him for that must first get the concurrence of the Colonial you; and when that refused, they had to tell him ferhaps Was an it wast an ssolt shin, know that he had well no technical fost in a second chance of a high present diment the The foregoing would. I In the C.A. case. On miegui, the general be that when it in Hathe be should I question, the anniver to consult acobuial Got the condillal should not ay candidate know that the Got Carmelted at all you is being A. F. Mr Mercer & I have talked this are. Put B, Pat By Cid 21 atonce 20/ } TONG ON THIS SUBJECT PRESSED TO THE TE FOR THE COLONIES, WE REFERENCE AND LETTER BEING QUOTED Sir, Page ... The original text appears to be a jumbled mix of unrelated sentences and words, likely due to OCR errors. The coherent text is a letter from the Colonial Office, dated 17th April 1903, discussing the communication of decisions to applicants. I have reformatted the coherent text into proper paragraphs and preserved the original page numbering information. The unrelated sentences and words are left as is, with minimal correction, to reflect the original OCR output.
Baseline (Original)
extent commelted to selecting him tombly the Cornelling bageris had said that they would the Yee of the recommend him for that must first get the concurrence of the Colonial you; and when that refused, they had to tell him ferhaps Was an it wast an ssolt shin, know that he had well no technical fost in a second chance of a high present diment the The foregoing would. I In the C.A. case. On miegui, the general be that when it in Hathe be should I question, the anniver to consult acobuial Got the condillal should not ay candidate know that the Got Carmelted at all you is being A. F. Mr Mercer & I have talked this are. Put B, Pat By Cid 21 atonce 20/ } TONG ON THIS SUBJECT PRESSED TO THE TE FOR THE COLONIES, WE REFERENCE AND LETTER BEING QUOTED Sir, C.O. 14140 154 DOWNING STREET, LONDON. Hong Kong. 12202 17th April 190 3. I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 8th instant in which you make an obser- vation with regard to the communication to Mr Southey of the decision of the Government of Hong Kong with regard to his application for employment as Executive Engineer in that Colony. In reply I have to inform you that we do not understand why we were under an obligation to conceal the decision of the Colonial Government from Mr Southey. It seomed to us that it was our duty to inform Mr Southey of the decision in question as he might otherwise have remained under a misapprehension in the matter, especially as it 1 was with his concurrence that the telegram of the 16th ultimo was sent to the Government of Hong Kong and it was no doubt perfectly clear to him that his birth might conceivably constitute an objection to his being selected for the posi- tion which he was seeking. We should be glad to receive fuller directions as to the cases in which it is desired that we should not communicate the decisions of Colonial Governments to appli- cants. Secretary of State, &c. &c. &c. Colonial Office. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your Obedient Servant, Интим
2026-06-01 11:52:35 · Baseline
View content

extent

commelted to selecting him

tombly the Cornelling bageris had said that they would

the Yee of the recommend him for that must first get the concurrence of the Colonial you; and when that refused, they had to tell him

ferhaps

Was

an

it wast

an

ssolt shin, know that he had

well

no

technical fost in

a second

chance of a high present diment

the

The foregoing would. I

In the C.A. case. On

miegui, the general

be that when it in Hathe be should I question, the anniver to consult acobuial

Got the condillal should not

ay

candidate

know that the Got Carmelted at all you is being

A. F.

Mr Mercer & I have talked

this are. Put B,

Pat By

Cid

21 atonce

20/

}

TONG ON THIS SUBJECT

PRESSED TO THE

TE FOR THE COLONIES,

WE REFERENCE AND

LETTER BEING QUOTED

Sir,

C.O.

14140 154

DOWNING STREET, LONDON.

Hong Kong.

12202

17th April

190 3.

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 8th instant in which you make an obser- vation with regard to the communication to Mr Southey of the decision of the Government of Hong Kong with regard to his application for employment as Executive Engineer in that

Colony.

In reply I have to inform you that we do not understand why we were under an obligation to conceal the

decision of the Colonial Government from Mr Southey. It

seomed to us that it was our duty to inform Mr Southey of the decision in question as he might otherwise have remained

under a misapprehension in the matter, especially as it

1

was with his concurrence that the telegram of the 16th ultimo

was sent to the Government of Hong Kong and it was no doubt

perfectly clear to him that his birth might conceivably

constitute an objection to his being selected for the posi- tion which he was seeking.

We should be glad to receive fuller directions as to the cases in which it is desired that we should not

communicate the decisions of Colonial Governments to appli-

cants.

Secretary of State,

&c.

&c. &c.

Colonial Office.

I have the honour to be, Sir,

Your Obedient Servant,

Интим

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.